Services
Products
Publications
Media Reports
Free Response Plan Checklist
Contact Us
Ask An Expert
Who We Are
Related Links
 

Featured Items
AFTERMATH
Interactive software that assists in planning for any type of incident.

Video Training
A Lesson in Safety
See how one school district created a crisis response plan and tested its usefulness with a full-scale simulation.

 
 

Parenting Programs for Chaotic Families

By Mary Schoenfeldt, owner of Schoenfeldt and Associates.

An effective parenting program is an essential element of any successful comprehensive prevention program. The Placer County Office of Education in Auburn, California, believes this so strongly that it has sponsored a number of trainings and has coordinated a number of peer-facilitated parenting programs countywide. Although these programs have met the needs of a large number of parents, they have not reached some of the high-risk families.

Responding to feedback from schools that the peer-facilitated programs did not meet the needs of the high-risk families that needed more structure, the Placer County Office of Education funded the Parenting Project, a pilot program in parenting skills that could be evaluated and, if found successful, implemented on a larger scale.

Referrals for the Parenting Project were obtained from the juvenile court and county agencies-mental health agencies, Children's Protective Services, and others. The heads of these agencies were certain they could provide enough families to fill as many classes as offered. Chaos-driven, boundaryless families were targeted as either voluntary or mandatory participants, with two objectives in mind: 1) to provide services to families that might not be served otherwise, and 2) to evaluate the effectiveness of different program models with this population in meeting their unique needs.

As with any program, the project could be effective only if families participated fully and regularly. To ensure their involvement to the end, participants were offered $150 to finish the class and to assist with the evaluation process.

Selecting the Program Models
As a consultant hired to be project coordinator, I reviewed more than 10 different parenting models and chose four to include in the project. The criteria for selection was cost effectiveness and ease of replication within the county. A secondary criteria was that local resources be used whenever possible.

The four models all focused on developing basic parenting skills, such as communication, realistic expectations, and family roles and responsibilities. They differed in structure, content and duration (one was eight weeks long, one six weeks, one five weeks and another two full-day Saturdays).

Alcohol and other drug (AOD) specific information was emphasized more in some models than others. One model was presented by a local therapist who also dealt with the parent's own childhood issues as they surfaced during the class. Our goal was to provide different structures and content to ascertain if families would significantly respond more favorably to one program than another.

Registration
Once everything was in place, registration was opened for department heads of county social service agencies and their staff to refer clients. All were supportive, but they referred only 14 individuals. Schools and community counseling agencies were then invited to refer families. The response was overwhelming, and eventually families had to be turned away.

Parents were assigned to the four models as randomly as possible based upon geographical location, transportation issues, and a few other criteria, such as age and family composition. Because parenting situations are unique to each different age group, parents with elementary school age children were grouped together, as were those of high school age children. Each group had a balance of parents from both single- and two-parent households, and adjustments were made to accommodate parents' work schedules. In other words, complete randomness was never accomplished.

Ensuring Attendance
Each participant was contacted by letter, and attempts were made to contact all participants by telephone regarding what to expect, who the instructor was, when and where to meet, and what the evaluation process involved. At the first class session of each group, introductions were made, participants were thanked in advance for participating, the evaluation process was explained again, and participants were given two pretests to complete. One pretest was specific to parental enabling and the other pertained to general parenting issues.

Continue to page 2

 

 
 
Planning Checklist | Products | Services | Publications | Media Reports | Ask An Expert | Related Sites | Who We Are | Contact Us | Main
 
 

Copyright © 2001 Schoenfeldt & Associates, Inc.
All Rights Reserved, except where noted.
Legal Disclaimers and Copyright Notice
Please report any problems to the webmaster.